Science of dating and relationships dobson teenage dating
However, as I said before, an evolutionary approach only goes so far.
The powerful roles of culture and the interpersonal context also need to be taken into account.
Alice: There is a lot of controversy about the role of evolution in the way romance and relationships work. ” Professor Fletcher: Well, the controversy is probably played up in the media, but it is true that some if not many psychologists remain skeptical about the value of an evolutionary approach to intimate relationships.
However, humans are the products of evolution, and the fulcrum of Darwinian evolution is sexual reproduction.
Moreover, the fact that culture and context bend behavior around does not negate the power of our evolutionary heritage.
Indeed, there is considerable evidence that evolution builds in behavioral flexibility to many species, probably reaching its zenith in modern humans.
But do our childhood experiences really determine what happens in our adult relationships?
Second, attachment styles are relatively stable, but are also exquisitely sensitive to relationship experiences.
As a child or as an adult, relationship experiences (good or bad) can slowly shift people from secure to insecure attachment styles, and vice versa.
As a preview of what's in the book, I sat down with Garth to ask him six big questions about relationships science.
Alice: How big a deal is good communication in relationships? That said, unpacking the nature of “good” communication is a major scientific challenge.
The big bang of adult attachment work was provided by Cindy Hazan and Phil Shaver in 1987, who reported that the percentages of people reporting being secure (56%) avoidant (25%) or anxious (19%) in their romantic relationships were similar those reported by Ainsworth in her observations of infants in the lab strange situation.